Skip to main content

Festive Chemical Structure Generation : Necklaces and Trees!

So, a student asked me about a homework question that is a sub-problem of the structure generation problem. Basically, it was to count the number of chemical structures with exactly one cycle given the elemental formula. Of course, the best solution here is probably to use the Polyá Enumeration Theorem since all that was asked for was a count (enumeration) of the structures.

Naturally, I have a different way to do this - especially since I don't really understand the mathematics of PET enough to implement it. So:


The image shows a rough overview of how I might list all of the structures with a single cycle. It takes a number of necklaces (one shown), and a number of trees, and glues the one to the other in all possible ways. The word 'necklace' here is specifically the combinatorial object; so  the cyclic sequence CNCNO is the same as CNOCN since you can rotate one to get the other.

One tricky decision here is whether to add multiple bonds to the necklace before or after adding the trees. It seems like this would make a difference to how fast the algorithm was - if you add the bonds afterwards, you might reject many of the possible attachments. Hard to say.

The other aspect to consider is the connection of the parts. If we consider necklaces (or 'cycles') and trees as types of block, then the problem is connecting together blocks into a tree. This is essentially the reverse of the approach detailed in this post - using a block decomposition tree to guide the assembly of the blocks:


Although, now I come to look at it, it seems like the attachment points on the necklace would drive the underlying block-tree. So perhaps this is only relevant for graphs that contain multiple cycles - which starts to become a much more difficult problem!

Happy Holidays, anyway...

Comments

One Joy said…
Very easy to understand with your words and very vivid. When I read, I also can't help to imagine the picture in my head. If all chemsitry teacher can teach like you, there will be no students dislike chemistry anymore. BOC Sciences
Here comes another holiday...

Popular posts from this blog

Common Vertex Matrices of Graphs

There is an interesting set of papers out this year by Milan Randic et al (sorry about the accents - blogger seems to have a problem with accented 'c'...). I've looked at his work before here.

[1] Common vertex matrix: A novel characterization of molecular graphs by counting
[2] On the centrality of vertices of molecular graphs

and one still in publication to do with fullerenes. The central idea here (ho ho) is a graph descriptor a bit like path lengths called 'centrality'. Briefly, it is the count of neighbourhood intersections between pairs of vertices. Roughly this is illustrated here:


For the selected pair of vertices, the common vertices are those at the same distance from each - one at a distance of two and one at a distance of three. The matrix element for this pair will be the sum - 2 - and this is repeated for all pairs in the graph. Naturally, this is symmetric:


At the right of the matrix is the row sum (∑) which can be ordered to provide a graph invarian…

Generating Dungeons With BSP Trees or Sliceable Rectangles

So, I admit that the original reason for looking at sliceable rectangles was because of this gaming stackoverflow question about generating dungeon maps. The approach described there uses something called a binary split partition tree (BSP Tree) that's usually used in the context of 3D - notably in the rendering engine of the game Doom. Here is a BSP tree, as an example:



In the image, we have a sliced rectangle on the left, with the final rectangles labelled with letters (A-E) and the slices with numbers (1-4). The corresponding tree is on the right, with the slices as internal nodes labelled with 'h' for horizontal and 'v' for vertical. Naturally, only the leaves correspond to rectangles, and each internal node has two children - it's a binary tree.

So what is the connection between such trees and the sliceable dual graphs? Well, the rectangles are related in exactly the expected way:


Here, the same BSP tree is on the left (without some labels), and the slicea…

Signatures with user-defined edge colors

A bug in the CDK implementation of my signature library turned out to be due to the fact that the bond colors were hard coded to just recognise the labels {"-", "=", "#" }. The relevant code section even had an XXX above it!

Poor show, but it's finally fixed now. So that means I can handle user-defined edge colors/labels - consider the complete graph (K5) below:

So the red/blue colors here are simply those of a chessboard imposed on top of the adjacency matrix - shown here on the right. You might expect there to be at least two vertex signature classes here : {0, 2, 4} and {1, 3} where the first class has vertices with two blue and two red edges, and the second has three blue and two red.

Indeed, here's what happens for K4 to K7:

Clearly even-numbered complete graphs have just one vertex class, while odd-numbered ones have two (at least?). There is a similar situation for complete bipartite graphs:

Although I haven't explored any more of these…